It comes up often. A buyer finds a sourcing agent in China who says they don't charge anything — no service fee, no retainer, completely free to use. It sounds like a smart way to reduce costs, especially when you're just getting started with China sourcing.

I've spent over a decade managing procurement for a European brand in China, and before that I worked on the factory side in sales. That combination gave me a perspective on this that I think is worth sharing.

Zero fee might actually be the most expensive option — because it's where the risk tends to be least controllable.

Where the Money Actually Goes

There is no such thing as a free lunch in sourcing. If an agent isn't charging you, they're almost certainly making their money from the supplier side — a margin built into the quote, a referral arrangement, or some kind of kickback for directing orders a certain way.

That's just how the economics tend to work. And when an agent's income comes from the supplier, it's natural that their priorities follow. They may still do a decent job. But their incentive is not purely to find you the best supplier at the best price — it's to keep the suppliers who pay them happy.

Why So Many Agents Offer Free Service in the First Place

This is the part that took me longer to think through.

Consider what usually happens when a first order goes well. The buyer builds a direct relationship with the supplier and starts working with them directly going forward. The agent did real work — finding suppliers, negotiating, following up through production — and ends up with nothing long-term to show for it.

So for an agent who isn't building toward something sustainable, the zero-fee model can make a certain kind of sense: attract buyers without an upfront cost, take a margin from the supplier on that one transaction, and move on. In that setup, there's not much reason to find the best supplier for the buyer — but there is reason to favour whoever offers the best arrangement on the supplier side.

When something goes wrong, there's not much holding them to the relationship. They were never there to build something — just to take what they could from a single transaction.

I don't think every zero-fee agent operates this way. But the structure does create the conditions for misaligned incentives, and that's worth keeping in mind before you hand someone your sourcing brief.

A Simple Way to Tell Whether an Agent Is Serious

Before any of the fee conversation becomes relevant, there's one thing worth paying attention to: what does the agent ask you first?

An agent who is genuinely trying to help will start by understanding your situation in detail — what you're sourcing, the project background, what you're trying to achieve, the volumes, the target market, the timeline, and where you've run into difficulty. They want to understand the full picture before deciding whether they can actually add value. That conversation happens naturally, and it happens well before fees are discussed.

A healthy working relationship — with a sourcing agent or anyone — is one where both sides are clear on what they're getting and why. That clarity is easier to establish at the beginning than to untangle after something goes wrong.

This is just my experience from one side of the table. The sourcing agent landscape is varied, and there are good operators working with different models. But understanding the incentive structure behind "free" is a reasonable place to start.

Work with Irene

From the factory floor to the buying office — I have worked both sides. I know what suppliers say to buyers, what they leave out, and exactly what buyers actually need.

I work with European and Australian businesses that need someone on the ground in China — for supplier sourcing, quality oversight, and projects that cannot afford to go wrong. If what you have read here sounds familiar, I am happy to have a conversation.